Oct 17, 2026, 11:00 a.m. EDT
4 min read
This is an excerpt from CoinDesk’s new ‘Tokenization Weekly’ newsletter that will be launching soon. Sign-up details will be here when it goes live.
Blockchain supporters have maintained for years that financial instruments like equities, bonds, and other monetary holdings would eventually transition onto distributed ledgers.
At present, a prominent research organization closely followed by Wall Street investors has formulated an argument supporting this perspective.
Citrini Research, widely recognized for analysis on general technology, artificial intelligence, and market movements rather than acting as a crypto advocate, shifted focus last week toward tokenization via a 79-page document entitled Breaking the Wall.
While the report itself is no longer breaking news, the underlying thesis deserves careful consideration because it illustrates how much the dialogue has shifted.
Over a span of years, the blockchain sector constructed sophisticated frameworks for exchanging, borrowing, and transferring funds, whereas the primary instruments investors desired—such as stocks, debt obligations, credit, and physical commodities—remained within legacy financial institutions. Presently, those instruments are starting to transition onto the networks that the cryptocurrency industry spent more than ten years developing.
Citrini summarized this dynamic succinctly:
“Blockchains have finally found their raison d’être.”
Why it matters
Fairly or unfairly, a long-standing criticism directed at cryptocurrencies and distributed ledgers was that they resembled solutions searching for actual problems.
There existed automated lending platforms, decentralized exchanges, digital asset wallets, and increasingly complex financial architecture, but if the primary utility of these systems involved exchanging one digital token for another, a lingering question persisted: what was the underlying infrastructure actually designed for?
Asset tokenization may ultimately supply a compelling answer.
U.S. government debt, credit lines, equities, investment funds, and alternative instruments are migrating onto networks, and once situated there, the primary advantage is not simply that a participant can trade Nvidia shares at 2 a.m. on Sunday.
The more compelling premise proposed by Citrini is that tokenization enables financial assets to function similarly to software: traveling seamlessly across platforms, acting as posted collateral, facilitating borrowing arrangements, or integrating into supplementary financial mechanisms without requiring every distinct interface to reconstruct custody and clearing protocols independently.
Those operational components are likewise beginning to coalesce. Stablecoins have introduced fiat currency directly onto ledgers. Wallets, marketplaces, and decentralized finance protocols have matured. Retail trading interfaces such as Robinhood (HOOD), Coinbase (COIN), and alternative gateways deliver consumer reach. Furthermore, regulatory bodies within the U.S. and across various international jurisdictions are starting to establish transparent pathways for tokenized securities to enter mainstream markets.
Why this is a big deal
Citrini is not discovering tokenization for the first time. Web3-native participants have debated real-world assets (RWA) for years.
The differentiating factor involves observing a widely read research entity external to the crypto ecosystem articulate the core premise using terminology that institutional investors prioritize above all: precisely where do participants generate revenue?
That inquiry proves less straightforward than it initially appears.
Citrini suggested that tokenization might elevate the wider digital asset economy, yet an increase in onchain assets does not automatically guarantee that bitcoin BTC $81,261.32, ether ETH $2,409.81, or whatever underlying network hosts them represents the superior investment vehicle.
Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX and chief investment officer at Maelstrom, expressed that dilemma with greater directness.
RWA tokenization has been discussed for a decade, he noted during a recent interview with The Rollup, and merely taking an asset already maintained in a digital ledger and logging it on an alternative database does not inherently generate substantial value.
“Okay, doing better bookkeeping. Thank you,” Hayes remarked. “Where are you actually going to make money in tokenization?”
Multiple prospective answers exist.
Tokenized shares can produce issuance charges, exchange turnover, stablecoin demand, credit operations, and collateral utilization, though those economic rewards may accrue in vastly divergent sectors.
Christian Magoon, chief executive officer of Amplify ETFs, which manages the tokenization-centric TKNQ portfolio, suggests that infrastructure providers might transform into “toll booths on the blockchain toll roads,” whereas consumer distribution channels could prove equally valuable: entities such as Coinbase, Robinhood, traditional banking institutions, and wealth management firms that already maintain direct client relationships.
Jeff Dorman, chief investment officer at investment management firm Arca, informed CoinDesk that he anticipates the mechanics of tokenization itself to become progressively commoditized amidst mounting competition.
The enduring economics, he explained, materialize subsequent to an asset arriving onchain: specifically when exchange activity commences, lending occurs, or it serves as collateral securing a loan. Consequently, he perceives potential beneficiaries spanning from Securitize (SECZ) to blockchain protocols including the ledger-based trading venue Hyperliquid, decentralized credit protocol Aave AAVE $156.04, and automated market maker Aerodrome (AERO).
Zach Pandl, director of digital asset research at Grayscale, shared with CoinDesk that a more straightforward wager might involve the foundational networks themselves.
“The most direct way to position a portfolio for the tokenization megatrend is to own the networks that host RWAs and process transactions,” he stated. “The industry leaders today are Ethereum ETH $2,409.81, BNB Chain BNB $714.21, and Solana (SOL)”
Alternative networks could establish distinct niches. Avalanche (AVAX) and Canton CC $0.1038, for instance, have adopted institution-centric strategies regarding the management of tokenized instruments and could experience rising utilization as commercial banks and asset managers migrate greater operational volume onchain, he noted.
Ultimately, this intersects with what Hayes regards as a much larger narrative capable of elevating tokenization far beyond mere administrative accounting enhancements: autonomous artificial intelligence agents administering financial services.
“I think the best story I want to tell is that AI agents will run all of your financial services,” Hayes stated.
Consider software programs dynamically reallocating your portfolio, routing dormant funds toward superior yields, identifying lower-cost credit facilities, or shifting collateral allocations as market dynamics shift. Such digital entities would require access to capital and investment instruments programmatically, continuously, without requiring human intervention for every individual transaction.
This scenario closely mirrors the operational architecture that the digital asset sector has spent years assembling: programmable instruments, continuous trading venues, smart-contract-based credit protocols, and near-instantaneous clearing.
Citrini arrived at a comparable conclusion, noting that tokenized instruments effectively translate financial instruments into machine-readable formats compatible with AI agents.
Nevertheless, ample opportunity remains for these eventual market leaders to shift. Amplify’s Magoon emphasized that the sector remains “extremely early,” with tokenized holdings representing a fraction of global financial markets.
“The long runway ahead increases the likelihood that future winners may differ from today’s leaders,” he observed.
Originally published at https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/10/17/citrini-sees-a-tokenization-boom-the-harder-question-is-who-profits.
